Poll Shows Growing Support for Book Banning, Ratings in U.S.
lj.libraryjournal.com
lj.libraryjournal.com
Edit - from the article:
> Caldwell-Stone pointed out that the survey’s questions about school libraries reflect a different set of attitudes from those surrounding public or academic libraries. Coupled with the broad nature of the questions, this could encourage a less nuanced range of answers.
There’s a big difference between trusting school librarians to make appropriate choices of books to put in school libraries vs. letting a politically appointed central committee maintain lists of banned books or subjects.
Only a small minority think that young children should have easy and unsupervised access to every book in the world.
* * *
Edit: I just looked at the original source, and IMO AlexandrB is a bit confused about the poll results. There were two sections of the poll, one about books in school libraries (Tables 1A and 1B), and another about banning books in general (Table 2). The two shouldn’t be mixed up.
http://www.theharrispoll.com/health-and-life/Censorship_2015... (scroll down to the tables at the bottom)
In other words, as far as I can tell that 28% is in favor of banning certain books in general, not just for school libraries.
Books with refs to violence: 45 SHOULD, 48 SHOULD NOT
Books with refs to sex: 51 SHOULD, 43 SHOULD NOT
The Bible: 80 SHOULD, 13 SHOULD NOT
For a country of christians, shockingly few seem to have read the bible!See that "online"? That most likely folks who were enthused enough by this issue tended to be the ones that answered. This is not a protocol to obtain a random sample. And it's a fairly small non-ramdom sample at that.
Found this article, but maybe there is some more recent research out there. https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-22/edition-7/paran...