Negative reinforcement works better than any other form of reinforcement, except when paired with positive reinforcement for desired behaviors, just like innumerable studies and common goddamned sense tell you.
positive reinforcement: presenting nice stimulus to increase frequency of behavior
negative reinforcement: removing unpleasant stimulus to increase frequency of behavior
positive punishment: presenting unpleasant stimulus to decrease frequency of behavior
negative punishment: removing nice stimulus to decrease frequency of behavior
The great confusion stems from the fact that in common English language, with punishment we mean both increasing good behavior and reducing bad behavior, whilst in classical conditioning terms, punishment always refers to reducing the frequency of a certain behavior.Punishment that I would inflict would be fairly orthogonal to the real hazards that they'll face in life, so I haven't seen much point in it. I guess I'm more of a hippie than I thought. ;)
It seems that there too few feedback loops in the Reddit community, possibly because it’s so easy to be ignorant online, and the popular ones are also of pretty low quality (SRS, subredditdrama, …). Those who can provide high quality feedback are too few and probably also don’t care enough.
He also tried this method on his own children and it worked quite well for his family :D
As someone who's anticipating having kids in a few years, I'm genuinely curious as to what a better approach is.