Hacker News Reader

Comment by davidw | Hacker News Reader

Joe Armstrong's thesis, ( https://www.sics.se/~joe/thesis/armstrong_thesis_2003.pdf ) has some good stuff.

Part of what makes Erlang Erlang is that a lot of this stuff is integrated very deeply into the language and its libraries. It's not just something you can bolt on in many cases.

View on HN

The parent poster asked for something "a little more accessible" than learning Erlang, and you responded with a 295-page doctorate thesis. Is there something else that one might have a chance at grokking in a single evening?

Erlang isn't hard to learn.

And Elixir is maybe easier. I believe the documentation is making strides, but last I checked there were some rather opaque references to Erlang OTP, and other things that aren't exactly obvious.

http://elixir-lang.org/

Perhaps not readable in a single evening, but this is probably the most accessible thesis I've ever read. If you don't care about the history or motivation behind Erlang, just skip to chapter 3.

However, I think the "why" of Erlang is pretty compelling in and of itself, especially if you're interested in extremely high-availability telecom hardware with an operational life measured in decades.

i'll second `tmm`'s comment. i skim-read Armstrong's Erlang thesis a while ago, it is very readable. if you invest a few hours one evening in reading it you can probably get a good overview of what is important, and which parts you might like to learn about next in more detail.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com