> That seems perfectly reasonable
No that's not , and what is shocking is that you find it "perfectly reasonable".
No that's not , and what is shocking is that you find it "perfectly reasonable".
You can find the essentially same four points on everything from Ubuntu to Wikimedia.
Can you be more specific about which part of it you find particularly unreasonable? Can you explain how the claims that the privacy policy allows MS to share data with the MPAA are founded?
You no longer have the option not to disclose something because anything that shows up on the PC may be fair game. Privacy is all about controlling who gets to see what information. Windows 10, being an OS, removes your ability to control what is shared in any meaningful way with its privacy policy.
Not just on the machine.
It can scan the whole local network, understanding about LAN, devices, services, all of which could be hard to reach from WAN.
The MPAA could be a Microsoft "customer" that needs protection from piracy. The MPAA could run a service with Microsoft that needs protection from being "defrauded". There are holes in the policy large enough to drive a fleet of buses through.