Even if we got stuck with a crappy cabinet for four years, it would be survivable (see 2000 - 2004) and the good that would come out of fixing campaign corruption would be immeasurable.
>Further, if he is perceived as competent enough to do all that, why would I vote to hire him as chief executive of the nation when he has stated he is going to quit soon after he is elected?
Because he doesn't think he is competent to run the country; he thinks he's competent to fix a specific problem.
I just found out about this guy 10 minutes ago, but I very much welcome this kind of discourse and honestly wish there were more of it.