The Business of Seal Clubbing
priceonomics.com
priceonomics.com
Cousteau wasn't an "ecologist": he started his career blowing up coral reefs with dynamite (on film! check it out!); he was also a jerk and an asshole of mammoth proportions (not to mention, racist and nazi sympathizer).
If your motto is "everything is bullshit", the very least you can do is double check those kinds of references.
Also, just because humans do horrible things to all kinds of animals (or to other humans; cruelty is our trade) doesn't make it right to club baby seals.
I mean I see how in the commercial process of killing the seals is messed up (natural rights to live...skinning then leaving the meat of the animal on the ice vs consuming whole animal)
But seriously theres no need to wear the animal if your not living like the Inuits.
Seriously, I wonder if there have been any studies to the "perception" of the material. For example, does a natural, scarce material "seem" to be better to people than a synthetic.
For example, it take high-end analysis to tell the difference between natural and man-made diamonds, but there is a perceived higher quality to the natural diamonds. Nature's mystique, if you will ...
I mostly agree with you, but there a few exceptions (clubbing baby seals not being one of them). If one rides a motorcycle and cares about keeping body parts in their original condition, there just isn't a good substitute for at least some leather use. I'm a vegetarian who is so in order to reduce the killing of animals, but there's no substitute for boots that have at least a bit of leather in them. I mean no substitute. Sidi makes some leather-free ones, but they don't work for me for other reasons. Gloves are one item that one might get away with synthetics. In the case of jacket and pants, I prefer my synthetics as their better in all weather.
And then there's goose/duck down. With that, it's more a case of synthetic being an adequate substitute, but an inferior one. If you're tight on space, down sleeping bags and jackets have superior insulation for their smooshed-down size. I've got a Patagonia down vest (cruelty-free! I'm off the hook, right?) that's loads warmer than any of the synthetic vests I've spent a fair bit of money on, and it packs to just a little rolled up ball.
But clubbing baby harp seals in the head? Yeah, not much of an excuse for that.
We still use leather, but in the case of cows the entire animal is used and while leather is sometimes a luxury good (BMW's, couches) it is also highly functional (gloves, saddles). Which is similar to the Inuit use of seals, and as the article discussed that use has been mostly OK'd.
Grim.
I do think the outcry over sealing is because they are cute. As the article points out, they are not endangered. This also affects the comparison with whaling. The whales everyone was most concerned about in the 80s definitely were (are?) endangered, and with whale birth rates being much lower than seals (and cattle, and poultry), killing an individual whale would have a larger overall impact on the species.
The personal attack doesn't help your cause unless you're just trying to aggravate people you disagree with.