> When you release code, there's an implicit commitment of improving and maintaining it
Why? Why are there any commitments whatsoever attached to making code publicly available? I could just as easily keep it to myself.
Why? Why are there any commitments whatsoever attached to making code publicly available? I could just as easily keep it to myself.
So, yes, it is better to release nothing than something buggy and unsupported. The former doesn't waste everyone's time pretending to be a solution.