If you want an operating system where everything is developed in tandem, you might want to consider switching to one of the BSDs.
How are those things nonsense?
Are we really going to spend lots of energy the next n years discussing the best init system?
Why the hell shouldn't we?
Isn't this a pretty simple and solved problem by now?
Nope. It's actually a very hard problem with little in the way of complete solutions. Take your ignorant trolling elsewhere, please.
Windows has no fragmentation issues in the core system.
Whether it is Systemd or System XVI im not really that bothered. Something needs to be decided fast however, and Systemd has a big head start.
I just hope it dosen't end up like the KDE/Gnome mess.
One kernel. One init. One desktop.
Windows isn't gaining anything on the demographics that use GNU/Linux for cloud deployments. You're reading too many articles on HN and extrapolating that Windows must be curb stomping its competition because of some smart business decisions on part of Nadella and co. You're further making the assumption that Linux needs to compete with Windows. It doesn't.
It's not that there is fragmentation, so much as the problem space is quite open-ended and there are multiple solutions. Forcing a square peg into a round hole (systemd ueber alles) is a recipe for impedance mismatch and stagnation, not unification.
One kernel. One init. One desktop.
Ein Volk. Ein Reich. Ein Fuehrer.