Facebook Identity Is Extortion and Slander
zedshaw.com
zedshaw.com
This is something that a lot of people (including Facebook) need to realize. Policies like Facebook's "real name" requirement - and the power to decide which names qualify as "real" - is the very definition of "editorial control".
It doesn't matter what the original intention was in creating that policy; if the situation as described by in the linked post are true, then Facebook's choices in how they handle account names have included (probably unintentionally) the choice to libel someone who doesn't even use their service.
The power to "edit" opens up the possibility of being liable for those edits. Sometimes it might be a better idea to avoid the liability risk by avoiding content-based decisions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jussi_Halla-aho
https://www.facebook.com/jussi.hallaaho
He's a member of the European Parliament and Facebook still doesn't allow his real surname. So he's Hallaaho, which is wrong even by Finnish linguistic standards, which state that all compound words with duplicate vowels should have a hyphen, like "Lähi-itä" which is Finnish for Middle East.
Of course that doesn't change the fact that Facebook should not be encouraging impostors while cracking down on real people, but it might help his predicament.
(Irony: his blog requires login through third parties like Facebook in order to respond.)
always enjoyed Mr Shaw's writing on technical subjects; deep practical wisdom, complete contempt for empty authority, and very dry humor--to wit (from the OP): "Imagine if this person decided to start [p]osting offensive messages pretending to be me. [W]ell honestly I doubt this guy could do that better than me, but the point is, they could invent some form of slander that would ruin my book sales."
This is exactly the wrong way to deal with this problem. Like the term "identify theft" where liable party is the bank lending to someone without proper identity verification, this shift the responsibility to the victim.
Currently, Mr Shaw (or anybody else in a similar situation) has no relationship with Facebook. From his perspective, Facebook simply stated to libel him. If he instead decided to play into Facebook's game and open an account, the disclaimers in Facebook's ToS probably limit his legal options. Facebook gains a significant legal advantage if you choose to fight by their rules.