What wasn't accounted for was that the book indexers have no incentive to pass on their savings to the consumer.
edit: Let's not forget the artificial restrictions imposed by DRM, either. How difficult is it to share a digital book vs physical?
What wasn't accounted for was that the book indexers have no incentive to pass on their savings to the consumer.
edit: Let's not forget the artificial restrictions imposed by DRM, either. How difficult is it to share a digital book vs physical?
So e-books should be cheaper than physical books, all other things being equal, but the cost difference isn't as much as many assume.
How did that work out for them?
I have also discovered that the ebook is not fully stored on my tablet, so I can't read it offline. (Google books)
So forget e-books. If I buy a real book, I know I have the entire book!
If the price of ebooks has gone up, the publishers are trying to find a balance of maximizing revenues and profit across the every distribution channel, while also taking into account any lost sales due to piracy.
Why should publishers give up rents to readers just because costs have gone down?
For some weird reason, no publisher decided to do that. Except pirates, but they always do that.