Editorial independence is a big vote of confidence; they don't toss that set of keys to just any old schmuck.
Editorial independence is a big vote of confidence; they don't toss that set of keys to just any old schmuck.
And will YC companies still get what appears to be preferential placement ("appears to be") for stories? [1] Some "more equal" than others?
If this is true independence then those benefits would be extended and/or eliminated.
[1] Or do stories about YC companies simple get more upvotes because of the balance in the community here toward people working at YC companies?
If you want to make claims about preferential placement (and yes I realize you're just saying "appears", but still, people are quick to believe these things), I'd appreciate concrete links so we can look into them. We try hard to be even-handed and when there are marginal calls, err on the side of not playing favorites.
YC founders and current/former employees are a large and valued part of this community, stories about YC startups often are interesting (by HN's definition), and lots of HN users like to follow them in particular, so of course you'll still see plenty of YC-related stories on the front page. It would be weird not to. Of course those stories are subject to upvoting and flagging as much as the others are.
But I agree, this is a huge vote of confidence