Also oome people might tear the boarding pass into many pieces so that name, flight,... can't be associated. But the barcode is relatively small. It might still be readable in one piece.
I scanned a recent VA boarding pass with a PDF417 scanner, and amongst all the other stuff is 16 characters without an obvious meaning. The boarding pass in the article had a similar region, and another longer one. It would have been interesting for the article to have pulled those apart.
Other schemes seem to assign only a tiny fraction of possible codes, which is why my Starwood number is twelve digits long.
I don't see any reason why they should do that.
US-based airlines tend to require an actual password to access the account and see future flights, spend miles on redemptions, and so on (I have accounts, currently, with four different US-based carriers, and all of them require a password for account access).
The confirmation code and passenger name are enough to make changes to that reservation, though; if you know someone's code + name you can cancel the return segment of their journey, for example.
I'm wondering if the person being quoted was confused by seeing the return segments of a multi-segment trip (which are part of a single reservation, and would come up with just the information on the boarding pass), and thought it was actually full account access.
I'm wondering if the person being quoted was confused by seeing the return segments of a multi-segment trip
I wondered that too. I'm a Miles & More member via Swiss (which is part of the Lufthansa group) and you definitely need a password / pin to access your FF account.Accessing a specific booking via booking code / surname is a whole different issue.
"Not only could I see this one flight, but I could see ANY future flights that were booked to his frequent flyer number from the Star Alliance.”"