> Just training for training's sake? That's nonsense.
I'm...seriously baffled as to what confusion of ideas would lead you to say something like this. Do you not know what the word "training" means?
I'm...seriously baffled as to what confusion of ideas would lead you to say something like this. Do you not know what the word "training" means?
"Does the need to train troops for urban combat provide enough justification for the military to conduct realistic exercises in actual US cities?" is how I wish I had written that.