I remember distinctly which professors of mine were effective at conveying the material and an understanding of it vs. those who were not.
The NSF spends a total of just under 250 million per year on math research. The DoD and DoE also have around 100 million each. Some mathematicians estimate [1] about 30k mathematicians in the US, which at a conservative salary of 50k per year (!) is already 1.5 billion.
In other words, either gov't agencies would have to roughly triple their funding (just for math), or about a third of mathematicians would lose their jobs. These are, of course, very rough estimates.
[1]: http://mathoverflow.net/questions/5485/how-many-mathematicia...
And yes, I don't know where the funding would come from if math education was commoditized, as perhaps it should be.
Teaching is nothing, research is nothing; grants, tuition, and donations are everything.
I don't know what's sadder, how far universities have fallen, or the fact that there's no sign that these trends are slowing.
They are ill prepared by their degree and can have huge communication or social issues that stand between them and their students.
Administrators usually push to give good grades for colleges with open enrollment. So the classes are easy and the test are easy. Make me sad and is part fo the reason I left working at a University.
I think it was a special form of multi variable, forget what he called it. Lecture was in mining. Honestly I went to lecture too rarely to give fair judgement
That said, I've also had great profs at Berkeley as well, though I suspect they do it out of the love of their profession the subject matter, rather than career advancement.