Hacker News Reader

Comment by steckerbrett | Hacker News Reader

My comparison was between the C1 offering from Scaleway and the lowest DigitalOcean package. Scaleway has far larger disk and memory, but the disk is remote over the network link and the 4 ARM cores are 32bit and terribly slow. I really like Scaleways configuration and control panel but the performance just isn't there. It's likely better for a lot of things other people are doing but I needed the IO and CPu performance.

View on HN

How did you measure CPU performance? With DO you have propably a high "burst" cpu performance but if you keep using a lot of CPU ressources they will probably supsense your VM because of "abuse" or something (my experience with other VM providers). On Scaleway you have worse CPU performance but you can use the full CPU 24/7.

Just general feeling compiling some packages and messing with 'openssl speed'.

Compiling software is a somewhat meaningful metric across architectures (with caveats), but openssl speed is not really indicative of the CPU performance, rather it's benchmarking its own fast assembly routines. That only matters if your workload is crypto-bound.

You could also be benchmarking the interface between openssl and crypto hardware, several ARM SoCs have crypto accelerators.

I tested scaleway C1 for compiling with GCC and doing some basic lores video converting with ffmpeg and they are terribly slow for this kind of tasks.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com