* Theres a theory that WIKILEAKS has been a FSB front since 2010: *
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/3pobtq/is_russi...
They haven't posted a SINGLE ANTI-Russian document since they threatened to leak documents in 2010
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/3pobtq/is_russi...
They haven't posted a SINGLE ANTI-Russian document since they threatened to leak documents in 2010
And really, don't you think the US gov would push that narrative across all the US media if it learned it was true? I mean, they've been pushing the "Snowden is a Russian spy" story already - and that's not even true.
The USGovt has to be sensitive to the fact that the leaks are real information. But its far more nuanced to prove that WIKILEAKS is just pushing an anti-USA/NATO view.
Look at the Saudi Arabia leaks in light of the fact they're in a price war with Russia right now.
You won't see an Iranian leak on WIKILEAKS..and you haven't.
What about this one: "Assorted plans and papers from the Iranian Ammunition Industries Group, 2009" https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Assorted_plans_and_papers_from_th...
The USGovt would never admit this because it might backfire as merely attacking a leaker, whose leaks are legitimate.
But the fact is, Wikileaks has to be judged on what they're not leaking.
In 2010, they claimed to have a massive cache of information.
Then guess what?
Moscow sent very subtle but real threats towards them.
And their tune hasn't been the same SINCE.
Its well outlined in the link.
The original post was removed. You might want to check that.