One surely has to question any claim that is
a) only testable with "unforeseeable future technology" and
b) whose "burden of an experimental proof lies with the opponents".
Win-Win there I think.
a) only testable with "unforeseeable future technology" and
b) whose "burden of an experimental proof lies with the opponents".
Win-Win there I think.
b) The link only says that some people have argued that position. I think all they're saying is that "wavefunction collapse caused by some arbitrary division between microscopic and macroscopic objects" is a stronger claim than MWI
OK. The actual quote from the linked reference was
"These proposals are all for gedanken experiments that cannot be performed with current or any foreseeable future technology".
So I took a little license in quoting. I should ha quoted it more correctly, you're quite right.