Social Anxiety
inessential.com
inessential.com
With that said, I do not mean to diminish the difficulties the author here has experienced. I just think that anxiety is not the most descriptive label for them.
For the longest time I had a fear of unfamiliar shower heads well into adulthood. http://i.imgur.com/qcVVJwCl.jpg
Like if I'm in a hotel room and need to take shower, I have to take a deep breath and stare at it, telling myself "it can't hurt me" over and over again. The same kind of nervous I get in a plane that's about to take off. I still get a bit nervous to this day at 38 years of age. I suspect something happened to me at a young age but nobody seems to know what it could be. I've noticed that my 5yr old daughter is also scared of them when they make those whoosh-sounds just before water comes out. Maybe I was traumatized from that too.... I dunno...
If I may: it's more likely you passed along the stress you experience in these situations to her. She learned to that the shower head should be approached with caution because you tense yourself around it.
Moreover, irrational fears are not necessarily linked to the stress inducing agent. It might have been associated later (to prevent your psyche to directly relive the trauma). That psy territory though so I stop there before saying anything stupider ;).
But really, it's because the only emotion I feel is fear, and I try very hard to hide it. That's it. Thinking about it logically, it makes little sense. Similar to how a person may have depression, and to the outer world, their worries/fears may seem minute; yet to that person, it's all about the feeling, and the feeling is very real.
I mean, why would you care if someone disagrees with your comment? That really wouldn't lead you to self-censor.
Unless you had something important at stake, like reputation, which would only happen if your handle on here was linked to your real life name.
Personally, I use it not for mere disagreement, but for "I want HN to have less comments like this" -- things like gratuitous errors, gratuitous negativity, unneeded incivility, empty comments like "I agree", and especially comments that just repeat talking points without adding any original thought or substance.
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=117171 "I think it's ok to use the up and down arrows to express agreement. Obviously the uparrows aren't only for applauding politeness, so it seems reasonable that the downarrows aren't only for booing rudeness."
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=392347 "Downvoting has always been used to express disagreement."
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=658691 "IIRC we first had this conversation about a month after launch. Downvotes have always been used to express disagreement. Or more precisely, a negative score has: users seem not to downvote something they disagree with if it already has a sufficiently negative score."
I'm not aware of a comment where he said downvoting for disagreement is a problem. I recall comments about gratuitous negativity, and comments about how certain excessively rude comments were getting upvoted when they should be downvoted. But it's possible I'm behind the times on that front.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1057347
> My plan for dealing with downvoting is just not to display points on comments any more. The hard part is that to make that work, I also have to come up with alternative ways for people to find the comments they're most interested in on big threads.
But as you say there's probably more to it than that. I'll have a noodle around with search later to see if I can find more.
Worse, you're doing so with all the experience and wisdom of an avid googler of nootropics.
Getting shitfaced on beer and Scotch works for some people as they self-medicate their social anxiety. For some people that turns from harmless social drinking to alcoholism and can destroy their lives.
In this particular case, excessive energy drink consumption (I personally tend to self-medicate with coffee to avoid the sugar in red bulls) can lead to heart attacks, high blood pressure and associated complications.
"Taurine is involved in a number of crucial physiological processes. However, its role in these processes is not clearly understood and the influence of high taurine doses on these processes is uncertain"
L-Theanine has more studies and is slightly better understood, but there still have not been full human trials and studies sufficient for you to provide medial information to a stranger.
Advancing a supplement as a cure can be harmful even if the supplement is harmless. If a person takes it for a cure instead of, say, talking to a therapist/doctor/psychologist, they could be missing out on an approach that actually DOES help. You may be familiar with Steve Jobs who delayed medical treatment for his cancer in an effort to use "alternative" cures.
Just because something is approved by the FDA doesn't mean that it's safe and effective. And, conversely, just because something isn't approved by the FDA doesn't mean it isn't safe and effective.
There isn't something magical about a clinical trial that suddenly removes all doubt about a substance. And this magical government agency isn't infallible, and has frankly made mistakes, some of them pretty major, in the past.
Let me share something with you. I've been suffering from severe RSI for close to 13 years. I've seen about five different doctors; I've had nerve conduction tests; I've had three rounds of physical therapy. Nothing works. I keep going back to the doctor, and they keep assigning physical therapy. Do you know why? Because, it's the only approved treatment that they can offer. Most of the doctors that I've seen refuse to even talk about anything else.
So I go out on my own, and I do some research, and I start trying things. Some herbal supplements, some alternative treatments. And you know what? This thing called trigger point massage therapy, in the span of about four months, improved my symptoms about 80%. I also found that B vitamin supplements helped with the nerve tingling issues. And that was several years ago and I'm still almost completely functional.
If I listened to people like you, I'd still be practically incapacitated and unable to support myself.
I think he's probably intelligent enough to look into any suggestions himself. After all, that's why people have ultimate control over their medical care. You're just being closed minded and pedantic, and your lecture on medical ethics is naïve.
So, if I may, get off your fucking high horse.
It's not like I'm telling this guy to go cut his left arm off. I'm basically doing the equivalent of telling him to go drink a bunch of cups of green tea and try a supplement of a compound that's so safe that it's approved for human consumption without a prescription. If it was dangerous, your precious FDA would yank it off the shelves in five minutes, right?
And if he tries my suggestion and it relieves his symptoms, even a little bit (even if it's placebo), then it's worth it. By all means, go see a doctor, but don't assume that doctors are all-knowing and all powerful and they are aware of and can prescribe the perfect treatment for your illness.
/edit I'll add that this is what happens when you leave mental health treatment exclusively to doctors. Hammer; nail, indeed. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/23/study-two...
When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. E.g. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3." "
You asked why the down-votes, but clearly didn't parse what I wrote.
I made no statements as to the efficacy of your proposed remedy, just that the problem is giving medical advice is dangerous, even if the substance is ultimately harmless (or even beneficial!).
There's nothing wrong with pursuing your own treatments, and I'm glad you've found things that work for you. I don't wish RSI on anyone.
It is, however, extremely wrong to give medical advice to strangers based on a single comment on an internet forum. You know virtually nothing about the individual, their symptoms or really anything at all about the specifics of the situation at hand.
Experts will want to know more about the specifics before providing advice. Fools tread where angels fear to go.
I'm sure you're in an expert in something. Whatever it is, think about the people who think they're experts in that from reading a wikipedia or newspaper article. Or heck, the newbies just starting out learning about that something. They are almost always so confident that they know the answer and share it with everyone around them. That confidence can be endearing and usually nothing horrible in consequences.
Not in the case of people's health. Consequences are too severe.
What I'd give to go back five years and slap 20-year old me around...
I've turned my life around but I have zero friends to show for it- and I don't blame them.
I can also relate to you when you say you do your best to hide it. I never realized I did until now.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/opinionator/2013/03/25/a-day...
i can't say i have social anxiety, but i feel very similar in this instance. and, if i can judge based on this statement alone- i don't think it's fair for you to say your fear comes from "no rational reason".
a very rational reason to be afraid of verbal communication as opposed to text, is that text is a much easier medium to control your message.
there are a dozen benefits: you have more time to parse and consider what one says to you, you have more time to formulate your thoughts clearly, you are less open to your words or tone being misinterpreted, etc.
are you anxious right now? this is very much a social setting. if not- and i hope this doesn't sound insensitive- i'm left wondering, whats the difference? and, would identifying the difference help you overcome your anxiety?
This is, after all, a defining feature of anxiety disorders.
Note that he doesn't say that this kind of fear in itself is not rational (propensity towards it might come in handy in certain social situations), but the degree of this kind of fear in the contexts that a diagnosis demands is totally irrational.
Even if we set aside the fact that the disorder in question does not deal with rational things, one can easily argue that (in this context) the text is more permanent, and can potentially reach many more than unrecorded spoken language.
Downsides include the opportunity to get stuck in a loop of doubt and rewriting the entire post. Misinterpretation of the written word is also common. Therefore, the trademark anxious rumination is not less likely to occur by virtue of the medium alone.
Some sufferers of social anxiety might be anxious in these settings, others might not.
All in all: interpretation based on assumptions helps no-one.
For me it's a catch 22 as well. If I'm not feeling socially anxious then I'm relaxed and it's easy to have confidence. Then there is nothing to fear and I'm not reading into anything or taking anything personally and it's all very easy and fun. But if I'm feeling socially anxious then I'm more likely to come across as unfriendly or weird, read too much into social cues and feel negatively about myself at the end of the interaction. Which feeds the cycle.
Something that helps a lot is meditation and being in the now. It's very hard to be in the now during an anxious social situation, because your brain is trying so hard to distance itself from the situation and get you out of it with minimal damage. But acceptance of the situation and reminding yourself there's no lack and literally nothing to fear in the present moment can help. And definitely presence after a (maybe just perceived) negative social interaction can help a lot as well to break down the cycle.
2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_Do_You_Care_What_Other_Pe... (probably would have worked better had I quoted it properly.)
However, I'm sure you'll agree that the fear in its context is irrational (which is what defines it as an anxiety disorder).
I have social anxiety but not Aspergers but I have spent time with others who have Aspergers. The thing about staring into someone's eye and not understanding social cues/norms is a trait of Aspergers and not social anxiety.
My first thoughts were:
- Introversion != social anxiety (disorder)
- Nonverbal communication problems != social anxiety (disorder)
EDIT: Forgot to mention that the article is great in the sense that it describes the author's experience vividly. It just doesn't seem to be generalizable to all those affected by social anxiety disorder.
I don't have any difficulty with social cues or understanding innate human interaction. I am popular in the workplace because I'm forced to interact with others. Almost all my friends are from work. By contrast, none of my neighbors know me and probably think I'm odd because they never see me. That's because, when I have a choice, I will always pick avoiding social interaction due to fear. Whenever I leave, I check the peephole to make sure no one is around. I have gone a week or more without leaving my home. If not for needing food and to go to work, I could probably go months without leaving. And this is driven by fear of human interaction.
I can appear completely normal in social interactions. I understand eye contact and not to linger too long. I understand the need to balance talk and listening when having a conversation. I get jokes and subtle humor. Fist pumps get me excited. No one had to teach me these things. And most of my co-workers think I'm completely normal in social settings, though on the quiet side. But when given a choice I withdraw due to fear. In High School, I spent every single lunch hiding in the library or a bathroom stall. I did not know what the cafeteria looked like. I didn't go to a single party or a single date due to crippling fear. But this fear was not the result of feeling confused over social cues or behavior.
The other thing I'm really interested in is a deep examination of your comment "When I have a choice...due to fear." Is it always due to fear, or due to preference? That could be a breakthrough for you, to examine this...there's a difference between the two, and a lot of times I would ascribe that feeling to fear, it was actually preference...a choice to avoid the fear. If I could push through that--rarely by my own will, but more often just by circumstances--the fear would subside and I would realize that the preference was what was broken. Not that it is fixed now, or anything...
Rather, it's like a pervasive pessimism. A more-cerebral problem, where you tell yourself that social interaction requires a safe reason (classes, work) and avoidance due to fear of some future hypothetical failure.
Please stop advocating for less-descriptive language.
Secondly, you're an idiot.
Aspergers is a specific form of HFA/Autism, not the other way around. Not all people suffering from Autism have Aspergers, but all people suffering from Aspergers have Autism.
It'd be like saying "thumb" is less specific than "finger", which is plainly stupid.
So again, shut the fuck up. Stop speaking for a group of people you have ZERO RIGHT to speak for.
For me, once I figured this out, all that stuff about body language, social time, and not feeling "weird" just naturally fell into place. These behaviors were mostly functions of a mind trying to micromanage every single little thing. I'm still very bad at actually getting into social situations, but when I somehow end up in one, it's almost always OK.
I think this is why alcohol helps. When you're inebriated, you simply don't have the concentration to reflect every thought back inwards.
I wonder if the author is sure his hearing is actually getting worse or his perception is getting worse?
I once thought the same thing. tldr: Nope. My hearing is fine. Anxiety causes my brain, afaict, to always be on the lookout for threats. No sound was being filtered from my conscious. The perception was that I "couldn't hear". I could hear fine, but I couldn't filter out unimportant from important. The result is something that seems like bad hearing.
Taking anti-anxiety drugs solved the problem for me. Like magic I could hear fine. Conversations, even in noisy situations, became easy to perceive and follow.
I couldn't find any documentation on this at the time. The doctor didn't think much about the idea. I wonder if anybody else had the same experience?
But, I've also been listening to deadmau5 for several hours each day since the summer of 2012.
I consider myself smarter than the average Joe off the street, and you do too. Otherwise you wouldn't be reading HN :) So social cues, reading a crowd, and being engaging, it all takes practice. Yes, some people develop this naturally and don't need to consciously practice, but others don't. So just like programming, stop saying "No, I just don't get it", and instead reason why you don't and next time nail it.
How to Win Friends and Influence People, by Carnegie
The Definitive Book of Body Language, by Pease
Those two books basically cover verbal and nonverbal communication.
These days I'm several years removed from the peer pressures of having a robust social life, though I can't complain about those years. I did have a great core group of friends throughout college.
The "condition" certainly in many ways has been a curse over the years, but at the same time, now that I think I understand it, I feel it's a blessing. I have many things I want to accomplish in life. The blessing is, given that these days I'm highly focused and motivated with my projects, it would almost be impossible (and imagine I likely would have abandoned them) had I felt those efforts were in any way infringing on the social needs (status?) a typical person seems to seek out.
But I can see how, without those same motivations / aspirations I have, it could easily be considered a disease and something a person would have a hard time coping with.
> I think probably because I stop caring about being weird or not — and there’s a big, obvious lesson right there for me.
I think this is the key for most people.
Everybody is different. I started dating this girl who's a real sweetheart, but called herself awkward and weird. I said, "But that's not what I think. And so if that's what you think and that's what I think, then isn't it arbitrary?"
Labels are incredibly arbitrary and I wish people would treat them with more care. Hey, person reading this, you're an asshole! It's ok -- it's a meaningless label and bears no consequence on reality.. unless you let it.
The more you tell yourself you're "this" or "that", you're simultaneously blocking yourself from who you really are. If the canvas (mind) is blank and you're filling it with negativity, what do you expect to happen? Your expressions only follow what's felt within.
Everyone has a unique purpose, vision, and perspective here; as a result, when focused, everyone has a different way of applying themselves to the world. Years of learning X things combined with Y perception creates a unique human.
However, it's not about being unique either. That's just a label and means nothing in reality. The pursuit of specialness is properly defined and labeled as vanity. There's something better than that in all of us -- some drive to help other, to improve our own lives to improve others' lives, to guide others into doing the same, the desire to connect, the desire to love, the desire to impart wisdom onto others. There's always some good inside of us that wants to be _expressed_.
Expression is limited when a mind clouds itself with arbitrary labels that promote fear. One day, we'll all learn that all negative behavior stems from fear. One form of this fear is fear from your own labels or others' labels (also known as others' judgment). I ask you who's reading this, if you have a good heart with good intentions, who cares if I think you're an asshole? Do you really think it makes it true? Now you should be on the way to confidence and a healthy lightheartedness.
I think one of the most difficult aspects of having moderate-to-severe social anxiety is that people often misinterpret the anxious quietness as standoffishness — then of course after you've experienced that enough times you learn to compensate by being overly friendly or enthusiastic which ends up weirding people out just as much.
Classic cashier talk at movie theatre or game:
Cashier: "Enjoy the show/game!" Me: "You too!"
Me, later: D'oh!
They are essentially offering to provide a doctor-patient relationship with "coaches" to make it so that "in just 12 weeks, you can lead the life you deserve".
I suspect no serious practitioner would be willing to state it quite that boldly.
Their copy reads like homeopathic/vitamins/magic/juju gobblygook filled with cherry-picked facts, figures, and good intentions.
On the plus side, the site has clear pricing information!
This is good, but he loses me with this line at the end.
Extraversion is defined as "being predominantly concerned with obtaining gratification from what is outside the self."[1] Someone can have high social need without high social skill.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraversion_and_introversion
What is the point of posts like this? So we can all get together and say, "oh boy, I really relate to that"? There doesn't seem to be any insight or useful takeaway from this article besides being relatable for a certain class of people who feel misunderstood.
Most of the things in this article that the author describes as being harrowing cognitive loads, like how long to make eye contact for or hold a handshake, are things that I have heard very socially skilled people talk about in a humorous manner. They have those same reservations and insecurities, the difference is they don't obsess about them. Look around. There is no such thing as "a normal amount of eye contact". Everyone is just winging it.
> There is no such thing as "a normal amount of eye contact" Yep. When you really learn that everyone is just about as insecure as you, you start caring less about this kind of stuff and just try to make the most of situations.
Regarding eye contact and such, there is no officially mandated normal amount, but there are certainly social norms, which some people are able to follow much more instinctively than others. That said, I agree that a large part of the issue can be that people with social anxiety, or just insecurity, tend to worry about it more than others.
That's the point, he described what his problem is and people are giving useful comments and suggestions on how to solve that problem.
Yet software eats world, digitization eats world, you conquered, and there is a purpose you're born this way, that's why you strive.
Having some arrogance will help in your situation. Take pride of what you're, change world to suit you, don't change yourself to suit the world. The funny thing is, the world is moving towards this direction already.
Screw the social norm, screw those extrovert psychopath, they're the root cause all human evil. Stop whining about who you are, you only need to prevail.
I read non-verbal communication about as well as spoken word. I hate getting just the voice. Phone conversations are the worst.
Here's the thing... other people really do judge you. Some people make everyone else in the room feel at ease. I'm not that way. Sometimes I can fake it, but generally people don't seem to enjoy conversation with me.
It's very stressful alternating between saying nothing and too much, which unfortunately makes it harder to practice this skill of conversation that some people just find so easy.
> Just stop caring what people think.
You know what social anxiety (disorder) is about, right?;PIt takes treatment, or at least work (like you say).
That roughly how the first part of your advice comes across. You are not the first and won't be the last. I bear you no ill will for saying it, but it's on the level of telling a depressed person to just stop feeling sad.
I don't know if I'm diagnosable as actually having Social Anxiety. Heck, I never even heard those words until some drug commercial came on TV, so I'm a bit suspicious of the label.
I do know that I see social experiences as different than most people. I've always been that way. Just a bit different in the head I guess. I like different things, think differently, and behave differently. It's part of who I am.
I'm very much the old-school nerd. The one that everybody rolls their eyes at when he starts speaking. I care about things they don't. I don't care about things they do. So it's work for me to communicate with others in a way that doesn't make them roll their eyes. Yes, it's a skill. I'm better at it than I used to be. I could probably be even better at it. But it sure won't be because I stopped caring. If I do that that I'd become an oblivious blowhard.
I've not actually been diagnosed, and honestly not sure if I would be. The key for me will likely be just practice in areas that work well for me. It will make the work into habit and probably make me more comfortable.
Now to find the energy/courage to walk out that door to practice...
Based on what evidence? Have people told you this or is it your perception that they don't enjoy conversation with you?
If multiple people have told you that they don't enjoy conversation with you then... GREAT! You have data! Go ask them what it is they don't like. If you can agree that they have valid concerns then you can work on fixing those things. If you don't agree then that's ok too. You're being yourself.
In other words, being myself is generally the ticket to eye-rolling, exasperation, and boredom from others.
My trick has been to keep others talking about what they're interested it in as long as possible. That usually works well because it's fun to hear what people are passionate about.
Then again, last week that got me trapped in a conversation with a person who advised me to buy gold and bury it around my yard because paper money isn't real since we left the gold standard. Nice guy though.
I don't know if it would help this person, however.
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/10/what-is-so...
Eventually all this rewires your brain so it figures out you are not in fact going to be eaten by a saber-toothed tiger every time someone laughs at you. It's a lot of work, it's painful, it's hard to stick with, and it works really, really well.
It might involve a little joke, or an observation you share or is shared with you, that means nothing but a chuckle, or you get a smile and nice feeling, and move along.
When suffering from social anxiety, this can be difficult as my brain was too occupied worrying about what the other person was thinking about me, and that anxiety leads one to not be very capable of being themselves.
Let that go and I found my brain freed up to actually be me in the moment. I found that my prior rationalizations ended up just being that. I found people actually are quite enjoyable, as is small talk. What I didn't like previously in those moments turned out to really be all about me.
It has improved my life more than most anything else I can think of. I think therapy results for many disorders might be mixed, but for social anxiety, exposure therapy can really, really work. I suggest anyone experiencing social anxiety to go to a therapist, and try it.
Perhaps being somewhat more self contained than others is a learned behavior to have helped us deal with being socially anxious. Would make sense. I accept it and it doesn't bother me about myself.
Because it's incredibly exhausting and frankly depressing to spend years worrying about why nobody likes you.
The rationale is that it's always better to be perceived as anything but "mal-adjusted and weird". Here are some strategies which are considered considered better than "strange": "tells too many bad jokes", "too negative", "drama king", "never stops talking about his own achievements", or even "jerk".
"Oh he's just another class clown, or just another person who habitually points out flaws in others", or just another <insert stereotype here>. Basically as long as you can make yourself conform to an easy to understand conceptual framework then other people mentally model you together with an archetypal social role so to speak, and then you'll be perceived as normal.
While it's easy for me to summarize the negative sounding "non-awkward" strategies I must also point out that for every negative one there is a nice strategy available too. Choose wisely.
The nice versions require more patience, and practice to execute convincingly and there greater room for error. The primary benefits of selecting a nice strategy usually only surface over the medium to long term whereas the benefits to being a bully for example show up immediately (you're mean not weird, you're less likely to be picked on yourself, nobody thinks your shy, etc)
Any of these strategies once incorporated can make you seem well adjusted and can with time become second nature. Once you have one of these in your repertoire then you can just reach for it whenever you would have otherwise experienced anxiety over possibly being considered weird.
This whole situation presents a problem for people who feel like they might want to develop a more moderate or atypical personality. They hear the advice "just be yourself" and they think "oh, that means the world is my canvas and I can just paint whatever I feel like" but no in actuality "just be yourself" only works if you've already trained yourself to project one of these preordained social personas. In that case you can gradually begin to incorporate your own style into it but anything else going to end up being labeled as weird.
It's not a hopeless for those who want to have a distinct personality, all you have to do is FIRST learn to successfully wield at least one of these socially preordained strategies and then later layer your distinctness on top.
Of course nobody is willing to admit any of this, because generally speaking to let the cat out of the bag does two things:
1. it makes people feel silly or embarrassed, and lowers their feeling of self-worth (even though it shouldn't)
2. to speak of it makes you sound.. well 'weird'
You know what's worse than people thinking you're weird, or dumb, or dorky? So many things. A million things. Words only hurt if you let them. (Of course there is a limit to this idea, but not in this context really.) So whatever the dread is directed toward, it's a fake idea.
A lot of times people try to address social anxiety by giving advice like "people don't think you're weird, they don't even think about you". There is truth to that, but also, people will think you're weird if you act weird. So you have to get used to the idea that people are going to think that about you, if you're a weird person- and weird people know who they are. (Funnily enough, if you don't care whether they think you're weird, you'll start to act less weird.)
However, the downside of not caring what people think of you is that you have no interest in being the life of the party or anything like that. So you can actually travel through the other side of this situation back into not being social.
Ultimately the key is being able to control your own thoughts, to interrupt the fear thought and shut it down, recognize it for the nonce that it is. I'm not sure what the process is for getting to that point, but you need to be able to do it.