12% of children's jewelry contains 10% cadmium; more dangerous than lead
cnews.canoe.ca
cnews.canoe.ca
Unless you're operating a nuclear reactor.
I certainly wouldn't give it to a child to play with, but the overall tone of this article seemed very much like plain old scaremongering. I'd believe it more if they'd used a more neutral, scientific tone. It'd also help had I not checked on their "CDC list of 275 most hazardous chemicals" - the only Google result that wasn't a reprint of the article was this:
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxpro2.html
There are 275 toxicological profiles, but they are not ordered; I can't find anywhere where cadmium is #7.
I mean, forget about the "company" for a minute - companies are made of people - don't any of them care?
It's a good argument in favor of regulations and strong health agencies.
It's easy for safety to be over looked when the bottom line is ALL that matters.
Consumers are their own worst enemy. Only regulation forces companies to comply but any politician that regulates and pushes prices up risks being un-elected.
The fact that it is banned doesn't seem to mean much.