Hacker News Reader

I must be missing something. I from the resources I read I didn't find an indication that these laws mandate that traffic prioritization is must allowed. As I gather they just don't specifically forbid prioritization.

If I'm wrong please reply. Not having a law that mandates true net neutrality is a shame. Having a law that forbids net neutrality is a totally different matter !

View on HN

As much I know, you are right.

But you also must see, that when something (so profitable) is allowed, than it will be used. Such a loophole was long time awaited by the internet providers. They want a legal loophole, so they can better sell their services.

I guess, they are already in the starting blocks to sell "better services" to the highest paying bidder. How this will end and if the nightmares will come true, nobody can say.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com