The Key of Hell: An Enlightenment Sorcery Manual (2014)
theappendix.net
theappendix.net
It's amazing just how far we have come.
And worth noting anyone educated enough to read and write, obsessed enough to create a whole book (even today that's an acheievement) is not going to be a well balanced thoughtful kind. Hence, manuals of black magic with badly drawn picture...
Here are some links picked up from quick Google searches that might provide stylistic comparisons:
18th century - http://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2015/06/09/charlie-charli... 14th century - http://io9.com/bizarre-and-vulgar-illustrations-from-illumin...
There is no real comparison with professional illustration; a professional illustration would likely have been an engraving, and would certainly have been much better. Forex: [2], from 1707.
[1] http://wellcomeimages.org/indexplus/image/L0040806.html
[2] http://www.mtsu.edu/english/minorsandprograms/history_of_reb...
"Sanskrit Beta 1469: this image is from a Sanskrit manuscript thought to be dated 1469. This manuscript is from the genre of karmavipaka, meaning “the ripening of karma”. It begins with a salutation to the sage Dhanvantari, the traditional author of the original works on Ayurveda, one of the world’s oldest medical systems. It explains the karmic relationship with a given disaster or disease; listing various sinful acts together with a brief statement of the alleged consequences that follow. For example; killing a cow will cause the killer to go to hell and having sex with a priest’s wife, the wife of another, a widow, or a prostitute, may lead to diseases such as ring-leprosy, bloody bile, or excessive urination. (?)"
which has nothing to do with Pseudo-Cyprianus.
(Just kidding. If you search for "Cyprianus", you'll find the illustrations from the article such as L0036628[2] as well as some text pages. Apparently the author just cut-n-pasted the link from the address bar after initially going to F0002901 and searching---the site doesn't update the address.)