Repealing the First Amendment is a tremendously weighty decision, and not one whose prospect should fill anyone with optimism.
Repealing the First Amendment is a tremendously weighty decision, and not one whose prospect should fill anyone with optimism.
It would be quite easy to overturn Citizens United, a weak 5-4 decision borne of highly-questionable provenance, without touching the First Amendment in any way.
Come on, at least be intellectually honest.
They wanted to shadow-fund a TV ad campaign.
Clever of you to leave those facts out!
Wait, why would it be wrong to bash a politician around again?
Citizens United wasn't about speech. It was about unlimited anonymous money flooding our elections.
Nothing is wrong with criticizing a politician. That's obvious. But thanks for the clumsy obfuscation attempt.
Even the ACLU supported the Citizen's United decision. [1]