I'm generally opposed to torture, but I make an exception for people who coin neologisms like 'fraudiest.' No thanks for that assault on literacy.
A: Dead.
There was a great interview with the folks at the OED about why they added words to the dictionary that someone had just "made up" (like 'selfie'). And their answer was simply that all words are made up at some point, and trying out a new word exposes it to the population and ones that effectively communicate a concept or idea get picked up and distributed. That is how the language evolves to deal with a world and a society that evolves.
On the flip side, many folks are rather annoyed that technologists took previously fine words and repurposed them for their own use and now they speak a language that sounds like English but isn't understandable by non-techies.
I'm guessing the OED folks would have preferred that new words were created to cover that case :-)
It's worse in eg German, where we take meanings that already have a perfectly fine word, and choose a new English-inspired word for them.
(Or in English as well, where people use `ask' as a noun when `request' is much less gruesome.)
I do like `prepone', and `whelmed' though.
"Sorry, I didn't get the TPS report done. I was circumwhelmed by Hacker News and thedailywtf.com"
They aren't, and a lot of people miss it - they don't know that dictionaries are descriptive, not proscriptive. They do not define words, they only catalogue ones that are used, providing their most popular meanings.
Incidentally, the pattern generates "fraudie", which is potentially applicable in the given context.
The above sentence looks like English syntax, but doesn't appear in in the Oxford List of Valid English Sentences. Therefore, it isn't English. Clearly, you just made it up.
Please stick to English sentences from the approved list if you want people to understand you.