Hacker News Reader

HNHacker News

Top New Best Ask Show Jobs

Comment by melling | Hacker News Reader

Full thread

melling·

They covered a little EEG ON National Geographic's Breakthrough series (Episode 2):

http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/breakthrough-series/vi...

I don't seem to hear much about this technology. Are we making any real progress?

View on HN

When you say real progress, are you referring to the underlying technology itself, or something else?

With regards to the technology, I'm not sure if there's much more room for improving EEG itself, it seems like a solved problem (how do we measure electro-dermal (or brain) activity). However I'm not a neuroscientist, so I may be off base. Where I do see room for improvement is in systems that can automatically make sense of the signals we're reading. This requires gaining a better understanding of the brain, though.

You are correct. I worked with EEG as part of my PhD research on brain computer interfaces, and it is a super noisy signal regardless of the headset. This makes is very hard to do anything reliably with it outside a pretty narrow scope.

Relevant to that, there was a kaggle competition a little while ago on epilepsy using EEGs. The competition/relevant dataset can be found here: https://www.kaggle.com/c/seizure-prediction/data

A lot of the current research on EEG headsets concentrates on how to acquire signals with cheaper, lighter and more robust headsets in order to be able to push the technology to general public. There is still quite a way to go, especially since the signal quality coming from headsets with dry electrodes is miles behind the standard medical EEG with electrodes that use conductive gel.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com