I guess I hate the idea of a "statistical philosophy." It's math for god's sake. Given these axioms, these other things are true.

The point about teaching relativistic versus newtonian mechanics is totally different because they're incompatible. One is more correct than the other, which is not the case here. In the stats case, both tools give correct answers to different questions.

Maybe I just get frustrated feeling like people want a data analysis silver bullet to teach.