In my opinion automatically rating posts will provide a useful filter to find stories that the community may have missed due to timezone/title issues.
What do you think about the idea?
In my opinion automatically rating posts will provide a useful filter to find stories that the community may have missed due to timezone/title issues.
What do you think about the idea?
Now what you do is to go through all (or as many as you could) stories that have been on HN front page, calculate features for those stories. Those features are used to learn a prediction model which you can apply to new stories to predict ratings.
The second issue is that stuff like this: (One of mine but I think it was a fascinating article) would probably fail any relevancy test: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1046378 Concepts: Charm, Bed and Breakfast, Localities, Lodging, Ohio
Yes, the algorithm won't be perfect but it could factor in historical data such as previously how many upvotes submitor's other stories got or how many votes did the stories from that website got. On both those counts, your post will score high.
However, you say:
> I think HN community is composed of mostly independent thinkers ...
That's certainly been true, and is probably still mostly true, but the evidence suggests it's becoming less true as HN becomes more popular and well-known. I think that's inevitable, and is recognised by PG, which is why he's testing and experimenting with the way votes and karma work.I think you need to plan for the quality and subjects to drift significantly in the future, starting now. If you can solve (or anticipate) that, you may have a winner.