There's no "reverse natural selection", the same as there's no "reverse evolution." If what you say is true (and I'm not certain that it is) then being intelligent and career driven is not a desirable trait for natural selection's purposes, and natural selection is working as expected.

Its time for humanity to realize that genes are no longer the only replicator driving our evolution.

Having evolved consciousness, we now have the ability to spread ideas, inventions, values, etc. -- memes if you will. This is why humanity has beat all other species, and what drives progress on a societal scale. Memes evolve much faster than genes.

The intelligent career driven people are busy replicating memes -- inventions, discoveries, institutions, influence, etc. The best memes survive and evolve. Is it better for humanity to discover penicillin or preserve a single bloodline?

So what will be selected for is intelligent people who explicitly value having children and people who are unable to follow the instructions on the back of the contraception packaging.

There is no such thing as "reverse" natural selection. It's just that intelligence and being career driven are not a favorable trait for natural selection. It's working just fine.

That's the net effect of contraceptives in general. People with better future planning ability are the only ones who use birth control, by definition.

I think you meant to say _inversion_ of natural selection.

citation needed (Marissa Mayer and Sheryl Sandberg come to mind as immediate counterexamples).