Why would anyone pay a 10% premium for a company likely to be destroyed?
If you expect to make your gains on the stock price (not, say, dividends), it's a perfectly rational strategy. Of course, it leads to things like IBM borrowing money for stock buy-backs to pump the price to make the numbers, which will be a long term disaster...
Many of these guys also continue to rely on their network for further opportunities and support. Their network would cut them out like gangrene, just like the old Enron titans, as to maintain their own good standing they couldn't be affiliated with somebody who clearly blew up their past company. That would be bad business, and that type of behavior would have prevented them from reaching those positions in the first place.