Iran has not invaded or subverted Iraq, Syria, Libya.
Iran did not invade Afghanistan. (USSR, NATO).
Iran did not train and arm the Taliban.
Iran did not create ISIS (or whatever is their acronym du jour.)
This isn't fox news forum. This is HN.
Iran has not invaded or subverted Iraq, Syria, Libya.
Iran did not invade Afghanistan. (USSR, NATO).
Iran did not train and arm the Taliban.
Iran did not create ISIS (or whatever is their acronym du jour.)
This isn't fox news forum. This is HN.
19/20 hijackers were Saudi (and more recently, so was one of the San Bernardino shooters, for all practical purposes). UBL was Saudi. Please point out to me terrorists with similar profiles who are/were Iranian.
Iran's funding of Hezbollah can be legitimately seen as defending their own interests. Just like we fund scores of militias all over the region.
Which part of assassinating Lebanese politicians, kidnapping and torturing soldiers, starting a war with a nuclear-armed state, and randomly firing unguided rockets into civilian towns can be legitimately seen as defending Iran's own interests?