Vermont utility says it will be the first to install Tesla powerwalls in the US
arstechnica.co.uk
arstechnica.co.uk
Or, a GMP customer can buy a Powerwall outright for $6,500 and share access with GMP, receiving a $31.76 monthly credit, which a GMP press release says "represents the value of leveraging the battery to help lower peak energy costs."
So this utility (which is generally progressive compared with their peers) is acknowledging that people having energy storage in their home is a benefit to the utility, and are even prepared to put a price on that.
There's a parallel battle going on with rooftop solar, with some utilities paying money for the value they recieve from this which is above the consumer cost of electricity in many cases, and other utilities trying to shut down users by imposing fees to cover the costs they claim they are incurring.
It might be good for time shifting expensive electrical rates but where in America is that going to happen?
I don't think they see value in home storage of power, first off the amount stored is way way WAY too minuscule if you look at it from a grid perspective. If you wanted efficient, safe, and reliable, battery storage the utility or an independent would be better off setting up a dedicated facility for it. Even if just a series of boxes at the front of a subdivision/apartment complex the manageability goes up a lot.
tl;dr utility company just riding the cool wave as it really doesn't benefit their consumers. far better options than relying on small storage spread across private homes
Tesla's site says "Each Powerwall has a 7 kWh energy storage capacity, sufficient to power most homes during the evening using electricity generated by solar panels during the day."
As long as you're not turning on every light in the house, I'd imagine it could handle a couple hours of outage, particularly in Vermont where the need for A/C is limited. Might not want to run an electric stove, but it'd certainly power a few lights, phone chargers, and a gas furnace.
Holy run-on, Batman!
Anyway, it's almost a 100% certainty that a utility company won't throw massive amounts of cash into a capital project just to "be seen as hip"...particularly when they're operating in a state that doesn't have a de-regulated consumer energy market (such as Vermont, in this case).
This happens every day, all across America, it just doesn't get made visible to consumers. That's why the utility is asking to be allowed to interact with this battery, it's just a subtle variation on the smart grid demand management stuff that's been going on for the last decade or so, that allows utilities to avoid paying peak rates for electricity generation.
(This is also why solar is worth so much in places where the peak load for air-con roughly matches the solar profile)
A 7kWh battery can hold quite a few hours worth of household usage in state like Vermont where people don't use much air conditioning.
The value to the utility is due to peak shaving, the cost of the marginal energy at peak loads is much more than the average wholesale price.
For a decade or more New York has paid commercial and industrial customers something like $50M to shut down capacity on demand in exchange for lower electric rates.
Doing that delays or avoids $500M investments in power plants. Time shifting and solar build on this idea.
If you live in the boonies where power interruption is routine, partial power preservation means your fridge, well pump and heat continue to work. You don't need to worry about frozen pipes in the winter when your on vacation or lost groceries after a thunderstorm in the summer.
1. Elon Musk announces the PowerWall in April with delivery end of 2015 (still on the site).
2. SunEdision announces end of September to deliver the first PowerWalls in Australia by November: http://cleantechnica.com/2015/09/22/sunedison-australia-taki...
3. SunEdision will partner with LGChem to deliver a competing product: http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/14040502-tom-collins/44245...
4. Vermont utility announces to be the first with 10 PowerWall beginning January 2016.
So, why there are no PowerWalls available? Seems that there are production issues.
Because production is starting up, with equipment being moved from Fremont.
http://cleantechnica.com/2015/11/04/tesla-gigafactory-ahead-...
side note: original article appeared on arstechnica.com http://arstechnica.com/business/2015/12/vermont-utility-says...
> Now, according to GMP, buying a 7kWh Powerwall outright will cost $6,500, including the inverter and the installation fee.
And yes, Tesla's been talking about that for more than a decade.