Irrelevant.
So, you benefit just as much from gun control as everyone else.
Which is "Not at all".
PS: One option is to simply jack up the cost of each bullet. At 100$ a pop that still useful for hunting or self defense so no constitutional issues, but your not going to see teens firing thousands of rounds. ;)
This would make me and a lot of people like me very rich.
And factually dubious. It's an impossible metric to track, yet statists everywhere trumpet it as though it's established science.
1) Violence is no less typical in the UK; as I understand it, you are more likely to be attacked with a knife in London than with a gun in any US city, and
2) In several crucial ways, the UK and the US are completely different - not least of these is that the US is the center of hegemonic influence in the world. For sociopolitical reasons, it may not be wise to allow this hegemon to be armed and unchecked, and this might not be so for other developed nations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intention...
United States intentional homicide rate: 3.8
United Kingdom intentional homicide rate: 1.0
In other words there were marginal, if any, benefits to disarming.
In fact, there was an increase in certain kinds of violent crimes. It may well have been a net negative.
No thank you.