Hacker News Reader

Your comments are not calm, they are flamebait; and your opinions don't appear to have any connection to the actual article, in which the author describes specific reasons why he thought the Journal's coverage was poor (e.g. their failure to distinguish between financial and commodity markets, their failure to mention China's announcement.)

can you point out in the article, with quotes, where your ideas are validated? i read the article first, read your comment, and then re-read the article and nowhere do i see any support for your summary.

the only thing i can imagine is that this article doesn't line up with your own personal belief system, and you're violently rejecting it.

Re-read your comment, and I don't think you can really classify it as 'calm'. It clearly shows your political motivation, the same as you accuse the author.