Of course paleo is absolute BS, so why does it matter?
I'm not suggesting it isn't but your dismissive comment doesn't enlighten those who are not aware of the controversy.
Paleo's basic premise is loosly based on the malnourishment seen when we transitioned from a diverse hunter-gatherer diet to a much less diverse agricultural diet (largely caused by iron deficiencies). Its a misunderstanding of history. We ate those foods before, but they weren't the ONLY things people ate. The result is ultimately still restricting diet to healthier foods which means it's nutricious, but still unnecessarily restrictive and without a realistic premise.
Any argument?
Not to mention the fact that your food has evolved as well.
My question was an oversimplification.