Any representative government being overthrown by a militaristic dictator is justification for war.
Please argue this. I don't see how I could disagree with this, but here's your chance to convince me.
Please argue this. I don't see how I could disagree with this, but here's your chance to convince me.
Have you seen Episodes 1-3? Palpatine has real support of the public.
(Look, dude, of course he's evil as hell, I don't deny that. It's just that arguments that you choose to prove that are not working.)
They showed many planets at the end of RotJ [1] where massive celebrations occurred, including Coruscant. I think these celebrations speak to the rebellion's support.
>It's just that arguments that you choose to prove that are not working.
There's nothing to prove. The belief that a people have the right to topple their dictators is subjective. I can only prove something if we share the same axioms.
Not at the time the Empire was formed, though.
How do you define who's a dictator and who's not?
If Winston Churchill have acquired more executional powers during WWII to get through mind-boggling beurocracy, would you call him dictator, for example?
You're trying to prove a statement that is true, but your proof is abysmal.