I agree with some of what he says. His second (? the one before this) post was pretty decent.
I disagree with what he thinks are the causes of both poverty and extreme wealth. An apt proverb is that the plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Generally speaking, people do not 'become rich' through entrepreneurship, nor do they 'become poor' because they were incarcerated. We can see through actual data, that being poor makes one more likely to commit crimes, and being rich (or at least in the top whatever % of the population) makes one more likely to become an entrepreneur.
PG's goal is desirable, but that doesn't make his analysis any more correct.