Hacker News Reader

Comment by lr | Hacker News Reader

I think we already have that... It's called "bank fees", i.e., depositors pay the bank to keep their money instead of the bank paying interest.

View on HN

To what fees specifically are you referring? If you mean things like low balance fees or overdraft fees I think they're both appropriate when they're not implemented or marketed in a predatory manner.

I'm not aware of any fees that are instituted "instead of the bank paying interest" unless you're talking about something like a low balance fee on a non-interest bearing checking account.

Most big banks in the US have monthly fees for keeping your money in an interest-free checking account. This ends up costing you something like $5-25/month unless you (a) also set up direct deposit with them or (b) maintain a minimum balance that is typically relatively large. This is why I keep my money with a credit union instead: better customer service, better rates, no stupid fees.

Edit: for example, https://www.bankofamerica.com/deposits/checking/personal-che...

I think the vast majority of people still have "free checking."

Not all credit unions are immune to stupid fees. The "low aggregate balance fee" is alive and well locally. People wonder why Walmart is gaining popularity.

You can find free chequing accounts though and if you're careful enough to not get caught by overdraft fees, they're the way to go. I'm Canadian and I know 2 banks here that do it, but I'd imagine similar exists in the US?

Hidden credit card fees. People you buy from pay it.

This is already happening with large institutional depositors: http://www.wsj.com/articles/big-banks-to-americas-companies-...

Reply on news.ycombinator.com