""Plaintiff has not alleged any facts that plausibly suggest the few seconds it takes to type a second word is something for which a reasonable consumer would expect to receive compensation," US District Jacqueline Scott Corley wrote Wednesday in dismissing the suit.
I guess you are in the same category as the plaintiff?
You are helping Google make money for free whenever you are using one of their services. I fail to see the moral issue with that. If you don't want to help Google make money, don't use them.
In their defence, reCaptcha are fairly ubiquitous. Very difficult to avoid.
> Why should I help Google make money, for free?
Not for free, that's the point. You get access to Gmail.
ReCaptcha is not only used for GMail. I've never used GMail, in fact, yet I'm still filling out ten recaptchas a day.