Apple iPad’s Tiny SIM Is Just There to Mess With You
wired.com
wired.com
Gemalto, which probably... Gemalto couldn’t confirm... Gemalto is the likely maker...
There is no evidence that... But the circumstantial evidence suggests...
Carrara agreed with our prediction...
I also wouldn't trust these journalists and their crack team of wild guessers to know for sure that space isn't a premium even in the iPad itself. You can't judge a book by its cover, and you can't judge the internals of a piece of modern portable electronics by squinting at the outer case. The engineers have to pack a lot of stuff into these devices, in a specific configuration, as well as leaving room for the next generation of stuff. (Does anybody doubt that the iPad will someday grow a camera? That it might someday need a CDMA multiplexer?) And the size of the SIM may well have ramifications: It affects the size of the access panel that leads to the SIM, for example. It also has to be placed in a spot on the motherboard that makes it easy to omit, since not all iPads will have a SIM, and such space may be at more of a premium than we think...
I don't doubt that the iPad could grow a camera. But it seems to me that it's not technical limitations keeping a camera from the iPad. I wonder if it's just the awkwardness of holding an iPad in the way necessary to take photos that led Steve Job to scrap the idea. He'd rather leave a feature off entirely than have it be implemented in an inelegant way.
That whole micro SIM thing is really pretty ridiculous. Imagine for a moment a world in which the iPad uses a normal SIM card. Space is certainly no problem. But there is this other device where space is a problem. How was it called again? Oh, right! iPhone. It seems more than reasonable that Apple would put a micro SIM in there as soon as possible. So now, what do we have in this hypothetical world? Incompatible SIMs! The press gets to write the exact same story, no matter what Apple does! Yay!
Seriously... Are all these articles about how Apple is out to screw AT&T's customers really necessary?
Manufacturers have used incompatibility to achieve business goals for the longest time, check out the print cartridges and the diagnosis plugs on european cars.
Now if apple would have come up with a proprietary sim card that would be (bad) news.
It's pretty clear they don't want you to use your Iphone voice plan on the Ipad anyway because it can't make voice calls.
How braindead would a customer have to be to fall for that? Alternatively, the customer could just be super-rich and not care.
AT&T is going to say, "sorry, we can't give you a micro-SIM, because your plan is for the iPhone" or "sorry, we can't give you a normal-SIM, your plan is for the iPad". End of story, as the 3G radios only work on AT&T's network.
My guess is that the 3G version is just not going to sell very well. It's super-expensive initially, and has a super-expensive monthly cost too.
I think it more likely that the sheer hassle of swapping out SIMs every time you want to switch devices (or take a phone call while using the iPad) will mitigate against doing this all the time. But there's no reason one couldn't do it.
I'm leaning toward the "buy a WiFi iPad and an optional MeFi box" option at the moment -- that way I keep my phone a phone, diversify my wireless options, and get WiFi for my laptop as well as the iPad. But I will need to do a bit more research and budgeting.
Although the use of a micro-SIM will be a drawback there, unless you cut down a normal SIM.