thats an interesting point, but i wonder, how do you know its true? i initially agree because the internet enables social reclusion, but i dont know if i have anything more concrete to go on than that. as someone who went to small middle and high school, i've seen how often people who would just be ignored because they are rough around the edges end up being great members of the community when proximity and exposure help overcome the initial friction. i guess what im saying is i agree with you if there is some reason to believe that there is something that has actually lowered proximity and exposure, and im not so sure the internet really has, but i really dont know.

i would say the writers response is very helpful though, it contextualizes alan for himself. could it be more helpful and less insulting? sure, but its pretty good overall, especially when you compare it to how little effort alan put forth in the communication.