Hacker News Reader

Comment by exelius | Hacker News Reader

So they've discovered dark energy but everyone is afraid to say anything?

More like they're looking at fuzzy pictures of something that might be really really interesting, but isn't quite in focus enough to tell. Kind of like what you might come across in a crypto-zoological situation. They need a better picture to feel comfortable they aren't the boy crying "big foot".

At least that's how I understand it.

No one wants a repeat of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light_neutrino_ano...

I understand why that may be the case, but IMO your link was a prime example of science done -right-. The researchers saw something they couldn't explain, and even knowing that that they almost certainly made a mistake somewhere, they put their hubris aside and asked the community for help. This sort of discovery should be commended, not avoided!

The science was done right, but the media management wasn't.

Lol, media management!

The mainstream (and wannabe mainstream) media care about lurid headlines, and not much else (apart from the occasional agitprop piece, maybe). Even the most guarded of press releases are regularly distorted beyond recognition. Good luck with the media management!

That combustible media environment must therefore be taken into account when publishing results.

Press release: "We possibility found a hint that might indicate X."

Press: "Breakthrough study finds that X!!1!one1eleven"

(I know I am caricaturing here, but certainly less than I'd like...)

Really, the only caricature I see is the fact that they use particular kinds of vocabulary as a substitute for exclamation marks.

Popular media: "Y and probably Z!!"

Social media: "You'll never believe that W leads to this one weird thing!"

Sure, the instrumentation problem was found eventually, but it would have been even better if it was found much earlier, before speculation bounced around the internet. There are quieter ways than a publication to get other eyes on the problem -- like a site visit by a review team.

The kerfuffle eventually resulted in a bunch of drama, including a leadership change in the consortium running OPERA (https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn21656-leaders-of-cont...).

Thus, the statement in the GP comment that "Nobody wants a repeat..." pretty much captures the issue.

No. Discovered dark matter? Maybe.

But not Dark Energy.

Not Dark energy, but perhaps Dark matter.

Basically , they are speculating about a new type of neutrino which is being indicated by a loss of neutrinos we cannot account for.

Neutrino Loss = Inability to detect = New type of neutrino = Dark matter?

Or it is just a instrument error :)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com