Hacker News Reader

Comment by pkaye | Hacker News Reader

I wish there were similar statistics publicly available for SSDs. From these failure rates, hard drives don't look as reliable as one would imagine.

View on HN

I actually am blown away by the reliability of hard drives. We've found that after 4 years, nearly 80% of hard drives are still working, and the median life is about 6 years: https://www.backblaze.com/blog/how-long-do-disk-drives-last/

Considering a 4 TB hard drive has to track 32,000,000,000 individual bits, allowing reading and writing repeatedly of each one, on platters that are spinning 120x per second, spaced a hair's width from their heads...I think it's actually incredible.

As for SSDs, we keep wishing that we could switch to them, but they're still 10x more expensive on a $/TB basis. That may change in the next few years, and if it does, we'll look forward to sharing data on SSD usage at scale as well.

Gleb (CEO, Backblaze)

Even more: 32,000,000,000,000.

I guess my point about hard drives is most people never back them up and kind of always expect them to hold up over 5-10 years. They have years of photos, videos and documents stored on them. Then there are friends savvy enough to setup a raid system and invariably the raid hardware fails before the drive does and they can't get a replacement.

Thanks again for sharing the drive reliability statistics.

Well those folks should have Backblaze ;-)

Do you have any idea about how many times you read/write individual bits before you encounter errors (are manufacturer quoted BERs accurate)?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com