No I'm saying that arrogantly the people behind these decisions cannot imagine a scenario in which someone else could hold information about them that would be harmful just by its existence.
They can only imagine their secrets being revealed, such as Tim Cook being outed before he was satisfied.
> you don't fear encryption being used against the average person?
I'm confused as to what you're asking, that's exactly what I fear. A rapist taking photos of his victim, the evidence being insufficient for a conviction, Apple now protects that rapist and his access to his victim's photos at the cost of the victim's mental health.
> For example if the police would search your phone in a traffic stop, that would be okay?
If they had good reason, that's the basis of the legal system after all.
> The amount of cases you could solve with a crypto backdoor
Crypto backdoors are ineffective. Service provider accountability is. This is why Apple is fighting it.