Hacker News Reader

Comment by rconti | Hacker News Reader

>“I don’t think building back doors is the way to go, so we’re pretty sympathetic to Tim and Apple,” said Mr. Zuckerberg

Shortened the article for ya.

View on HN

Nice one.

And not only that, but "backdoor" isn't accurate. It's not what has been requested. "Backdoor" sounds more provocative though, and helps build numbers for the Apple side of the debate.

If Apple can crack the phone open, let's see it happen. And then after that, they should improve iOS security so not even Apple can crack it.

I'm not impressed that Apple can if they wanted to, build in a system to weaken my phone's security. They should patch that opportunity in the next release.

Backdoor is not what is not mentioned today but it is what will be sought when Apple does make an unbreakable phone.

If a loudly media backed ruling to force Apple to comply with the FBI is then followed by Apple making a phone which makes it impossible to comply with such requests in the future, it will much easier to get legislation or rulings requiring the all phones have an inbuilt backdoor.

This is why the FBI is forcing Apple specifically to do what they or another organization (eg McAfee) might do. Especially since the phone in question, while spectacular from a media perspective, probably has very little interesting on it.

What Apple should have done is quietly comply and NOT set a precedent. Then quietly make it impossible to comply on later phones. Instead they're making a scene about an issue they probably will and should lose.

The order came from a public court. According to an article in the nytimes Apple asked the FBI to keep it secret.

I understand your point. But I think too many people have already hosed down the idea of true backdoor features inbuilt for all phones to get around encryption. It was raised previously, and smacked down by the majority, including from many voices within the government.

I think honesty is the best option. Apple should say "yes, we can help this time, but we believe in privacy and security, so in future our phones will not be able to be cracked by this or any method". Apple gets to be the good guys for customers, AND help the FBI in this instance. Win win.

In future, the FBI couldn't ask Apple anything because we all know their phones are unbreakable.

But Apple have dug themselves a hole this time by refusing to go the full distance even though it's technically possible. Probably not the best move IMHO.

I'm of course only presuming it's possible to make such an unbreakable phone in future.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com