Hacker News Reader

I use emacs for long haul editing, but vi for quick edits and sysadmin work.

That's just silly. mg is much nicer.

According to what criteria?

That it works more like Emacs than Vi, which is an advantage to someone who uses Emacs "for long haul editing".

Good point, thanks for elaborating.

How it it better than jove? (Just curious).

$ emacs -q works pretty well for quick edits too