As a publisher, you should say fuck you to the ads networks that pay you to track your readers, not to the readers trying to protect themselves.
You're selling out your readers, who are harmed by that. The cross-site aggregation that Google does is far more harmful (see: "pattern of life" analysis) than a smaller tracker with bad security. This makes you just as responsible.
My point is its the users responsibility to protect himself, if he goes on the Internet without any idea whats going on its just naive and my ads are the smallest of his problems.
Yes, it's a good idea for people to defend themselves. That doesn't make publishers any less responsible when they betray their readers to aggregators like Google.
> As publisher
You're telling your readers they need to talk to some other host - which may be owned by Google or similar - to get part of the page. Then you claim that it's their fault for being stupid (really: ignorant) enough to listen to you?
I dont want to be tracked personally. That does not mean that other people who also use Windows, iPhones, Dropbox and whatever even care. Why would i tell them obivous things they dont even care about?
Not sure what gives you the idea that i would depend parts of my site to external services, i dont even use S3/AWS even thought thats industry standard. My sites work perfectly without ads, i even include ads in a way that they get invisible when blocked, so there are no UI (or any other) issues for people who prefer to block them.
I am not going to play the internet hero and miss out on my awesome extra income just because some people have radical thoughts about Google. It may makes you happy that i only have ads on sites which are worth it, but all the others have Adsense, so i assume you dont care.
Edit:// I also use Cloudflare if that helps ;)