It was merely an observation. Of course, one can simply negate the value before passing it to jo.
jo looked as though it was for use in the shell though, so I was curious as to the design decision here.
I think it makes sense how it is, since if I typed "success@1" I wouldn't expect that to output "{success: false}" but I definitely appreciate your point about a case like "success@$?".
> Of course, one can simply negate the value before passing it to jo.
What's the shortest way to do that? This?
echo success@$(test $? -ne 0; echo $?) $ false; echo success@$((! $?))
success@0