Yeah, so here's the thing:

1. Your job application probably has language that discourage women from applying [1].

2. Men tend to apply for jobs even though they don't meet all of the qualifications, whereas women tend not to [2].

So there's bias introduced before you even see the list of applicants, and given no other information, it would not be that surprising to find a randomly selected woman from that candidate pool would be more qualified than a randomly selected man.

[1] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/02/textio-unitive-bias...

[2] http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/05/the-conf...