A few years earlier, they destroyed the tracks from Renton to Black Diamond so thoroughly the right-of-way can never be used for rail again.
It boggles the mind.
A few years earlier, they destroyed the tracks from Renton to Black Diamond so thoroughly the right-of-way can never be used for rail again.
It boggles the mind.
I was always under the impression that the Sounder (our commuter heavy rail line) used tracks shared with commercial traffic (BNSF, etc.) and thus couldn't be fully developed into a city-wide system...
Seattle Transit just announced a $50 billion plan to blast new right-of-way, never mind the trackage could be doubled by re-using that right-of-way for a few million.
You can still see the tracks on Google Maps:
https://www.google.com/maps/@47.6753261,-122.1882192,16z
although it has been renamed "Cross Kirkland Corridor" in their attempt to hide what it is. Sound Transit prefers a plan that costs one thousand times as much, still won't serve the eastside, and will not be in service until half the existing taxpayers are long dead.
http://seattletransitblog.com/2016/03/12/kirkland-st-struggl...
I'd build the system to the border of Kirkland, and wait for the Kirkland residents to get fed up with rotting on 405.
The Eastside (the Kemper Freeman Jr cohort) has traditionally spiked anything resembling public transit, public good, regional bon ami. Apart from their public statements about "those people", I assume their primary bare knuckled motivation is that anything that hurts Seattle helps Bellevue (landlords). Which I'm totally fine with, love and war and all that. I just hate the hypocrisy.