> They use these non-arbitration clauses, and they are always right.
What do the clauses look like? What does it mean that they are "always right"? What is the consequence of this rightness?
What do the clauses look like? What does it mean that they are "always right"? What is the consequence of this rightness?
NYTimes is doing some great reporting on the topic - start here: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/01/business/dealbook/arbitrat...
I've heard that called a "arbitration clause", but never a "non-arbitration clause", as the person I was responding to put it.