1. no single letter user name allowed in the installer
2. yast rewriting config files
3. I couldn't get the partitioning tool to do what I tried which is plain simple /boot plus encrypted swap and root.
1. no single letter user name allowed in the installer
2. yast rewriting config files
3. I couldn't get the partitioning tool to do what I tried which is plain simple /boot plus encrypted swap and root.
2. formerly true - YaST lives happily with config files these days. When possible it co-exists, only a few specific YaST modules need that absolute control and only rewrites them by warning you well in advance. ie. Not true any more
3. I think we fixed that..it's a radio button now.. Encrypted LVM-based proposal https://lizards.opensuse.org/2016/03/15/highlights-of-develo...
"Mr Brown from Suse wrote in a HN thread..." will not be enough as a reliable source of information. Yes, I could just read the source, however I am expecting such an extraordinary important thing that will change my config files to be documented. I need precise information here.
Also it would be important to know how this conflicts with configuration management systems like chef, ansible, puppet etc. - or is yast able to manage multiple workstations itself, so is is a replacement for these tools?
Thanks!
It doesn't conflict with other configuration management systems. I've used openSUSE extensively with puppet and saltstack.
Many of SUSE's products use other configuration management systems as part of their toolchain, and SUSE are shipping SUSE Manager 3.0 with SaltStack, so their customers are expected to be able to use YaST alongside such a system
http://www.rubydoc.info/github/yast/yast-yast2/
http://yast-core.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
I am not trying to make you angry, but I think I put the finger right on the place where it hurts very much.
There is no clear documentation about what yast does or what it will not do - basically a blackbox. Maybe it will change apache config. Maybe not. Who knows.
Users know - YaST doesn't change stuff without telling you, that was the point I was trying to make earlier. Users of YaST no longer have to worry about it silently taking over config files, it either co-exists or doesn't do anything without telling the user with great big pop-up boxes first